Skip to content

Dhāraṇā 71: The Vanishing Inner Instrument (Verse 94)

1. Exercise Title & Verse

Dhāraṇā 71: The Vanishing Inner Instrument (Verse 94)

2. Sanskrit (IAST)

cittādyantaḥkṛtir nāsti mamāntar bhāvayed iti | vikalpānām abhāvena vikalpair ujjhito bhavet || 94 ||

3. English (Literal)

One should contemplate thus: Within me the inner mental apparatus beginning with citta does not exist. Through the absence of thought-constructs, one becomes free from thought-constructs.

4. Main Commentary (Bhāṣya)

Padārtha. Cittādi-antaḥkṛtiḥ means the inner mental apparatus beginning with citta and including mind, intellect, ego, and the rest of the inward psychic machinery. Nāsti mamāntar means does not exist within me: the point is de-identification, not a metaphysical claim that functional mentality can never appear. Bhāvayed iti means one should contemplate or cultivate this recognition deliberately. Vikalpānām abhāvena means through the absence of thought-constructs, especially self-defining conceptualizations. Vikalpair ujjhitaḥ bhavet means one becomes rid of such constructs.

Anvaya. Contemplate thus: the inner instrument of mind, ego, and the like does not truly exist within me as my identity; then, because thought-constructs lose their footing, one becomes free of them.

Tatparya. Verse 94 turns inward after Verse 93's one-pointed bodily pain. The previous dhāraṇā used a localized sensation to gather awareness. This verse uses refined contemplation to withdraw identity from the whole mental apparatus itself. Singh states the doctrinal point: when one becomes fully convinced that one is not the inner apparatus of mind, intellect, and ego, vikalpas cease and pure consciousness shines as one's essential nature. Lakshmanjoo gives the operative instruction more bluntly: imagine that these three internal organs are not existing in you, and their functioning will cease. Hareesh's direct note on the verse catches the subtlety well: the mind is used to contemplate the mind's nonexistence, causing a kind of short circuit. That is what this verse newly clarifies. It is not anti-intellectual fury, and it is not numb blankness. It is a surgical refusal to let inner operations pose as the Self.

Sādhana. When thought, self-commentary, judgment, or self-image are active, do not wrestle each one separately. Instead contemplate in one stroke: this inner machinery is not what I am. Do not say it mechanically. Let the contemplation cut identification at the root. The mind may still flicker, but it is no longer granted ontological authority. Stay with the felt fact that awareness remains even when mind, intellect, and ego are not being taken as me. If the contemplation is working, thought loses compulsion and starts dropping its claim to centrality. If you merely repeat there is no mind while remaining fascinated with the mind, the verse has been missed.

5. Jaideva Singh — The Logical

The compound cittādi-antaḥkṛtiḥ points to the whole inner apparatus beginning with citta and extending through its operative forms. Singh's note specifies the practical referents as manas, buddhi, and ahaṃkāra. Mamāntar is decisive: the contemplative formula denies that this apparatus is truly within me as my essential identity. The second half is not redundant. Vikalpānām abhāvena states the causal condition, and vikalpair ujjhitaḥ bhavet states the result: in the absence of thought-constructs, one becomes rid of thought-constructs and abides as pure consciousness. Singh classifies the verse as śāktopāya.

6. Swami Lakshmanjoo — The Lineage

Keep the instruction exact. The three internal organs are mind, intellect, and ego. Imagine that they are not existing in you. Then contemplate on that very imagination. The method is not to fight each thought but to remove the basis on which their functioning claims ownership. Lakshmanjoo's hinge is clear: when this contemplation becomes operative, their function ceases for good in that moment and one enters the thought-free state. If you turn the verse into vague anti-thought rhetoric or into a trance of blankness, you have missed the precision of the instruction.

7. Mark Dyczkowski & Christopher Wallis — Context & Philology

The direct public evidence is unusually helpful here. In Hareesh's official concordance, Verse 94 is titled There is no mind and translated as contemplating that there is no mental apparatus within oneself, consisting of mind, ego, and the like, so that one becomes free of the thought-constructs built on that apparatus. The same official page preserves Dyczkowski's rendering: reflect that there is no inner mental organ within oneself, whether mind, intellect, or ego, and thus, because thoughts lose their basis, one is rid of them. Hareesh's 2016 VBT essay then comments on Verse 94 explicitly, calling it a paradoxical reconciliation of classical yogic practice with Tantric bhāvanā: the mind is used to contemplate its own nonexistence, producing a short circuit for the qualified practitioner. No public verse-specific prose commentary by Dyczkowski beyond translation-level evidence was located in this pass.

Indirect context only: Hareesh's essay on the Indian model of mind clarifies that citta is a general term and that manas, buddhi, and ahaṃkāra are aspects of the inner instrument, not isolated compartments. That helps with terminology, but it is not a gloss on Verse 94 itself.

8. Daniel Odier — The Somatic Grounding

Let the usual inner furniture fail to appear. No commentator inside the chest, no manager behind the forehead, no claimant tightening around I. What remains is not vacancy in the dead sense, but bare awake presence with nothing to hold up.

9. Paul Reps — The "Sudden Hit"

When some desire comes, consider it. Then, suddenly, quit it.

10. Upāya Type

Śāktopāya. Singh states this directly, and Lakshmanjoo also treats the verse as a contemplative use of refined thought to cut the basis of thought.

11. Resonance Check (Adhikāra)

This dhāraṇā suits a practitioner capable of subtle introspection without becoming self-absorbed. It especially fits someone who can notice identification with mind and withdraw consent from it in a clean, concentrated way.

12. The "What Else?" — The Pitfall

The trap is to turn the verse into a slogan like thoughts are unreal while continuing to identify with every movement of mind. Then the contemplation never reaches the root claim of the inner instrument to be me.

13. Verse-Specific Glossary

  • antaḥkṛti / antaḥkaraṇa: the inner instrument, the whole mental apparatus. Here it means the structures by which thought, judgment, and self-image operate inwardly.
  • citta: the mind-field in a broad sense. Here it stands for the beginning of the whole inward apparatus rather than for a separate fourth compartment.
  • vikalpa: thought-construct or conceptual formation. Here it especially means self-defining mental constructions that keep awareness identified with mind.
  • bhāvayet: should contemplate or cultivate inwardly. Here it means a deliberate contemplative act strong enough to shift identity, not a casual idea.